Legal Opinion

Brameld v. Albert Dickinson Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1932No. 28,833PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Certiorari to review the order of the industrial commission awarding compensation for the death of respondent’s husband, alleged to have been accidentally caused while in the employ of the Albert Dickinson Company, a corporation doing business in Minneapolis. The Indemnity Insurance Company of North America is the insurer.

In 1930 the deceased, Raymond Bernard Brameld, was in the employ of the defendant as a traveling salesman. He worked out of Mason City, Iowa, where he lived. He was furnished an automobile, carried samples, visited the trade, made his routes much upon his own judgment, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Jeffers v. Borgen Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Rice v. Keystone View Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Marrier v. National Painting Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Cullamore v. Groneweg & Schoentgen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API