Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Geer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 2007PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Benjamin Geer, Jr., purports to appeal, nunc pro tunc, from the June 15, 2005 order dismissing his first petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Because the PCRA court did not have jurisdiction to reinstate Appellant’s PCRA appellate rights nunc pro tunc, we quash this appeal.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows: On January 7, 2002, Appellant pled guilty to involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (IDSI) and aggravated indecent assault.1 The pleas stem from Appellant’s sexual abuse of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. GandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Com. v. Burch, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Carmichael, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API