Legal Opinion

Hale v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s cause of action at the close of the plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evidence in tMs case relating to the condition of the steps in question is exceedingly meager. All we have are such conelusory, descriptive adjectives as “worn”, “smooth”, “slippery”; Accordingly, although on the record before us we can do no other but affirm, we would note that the facts in Kline v. Abraham (178 N. Y. 377) are quite distinguishable from those in this case; and Mitcheltree v. Stair (135 App. Div. 210 [1st Dept.]), should not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kline v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Mitcheltree v. StairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Time Incorporated v. Bernard Geis AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Birnbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
  4. Frederick Chusid & Co. v. Marshall Leeman & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  5. Meeropol v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API