Hale v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s cause of action at the close of the plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evidence in tMs case relating to the condition of the steps in question is exceedingly meager. All we have are such conelusory, descriptive adjectives as “worn”, “smooth”, “slippery”; Accordingly, although on the record before us we can do no other but affirm, we would note that the facts in Kline v. Abraham (178 N. Y. 377) are quite distinguishable from those in this case; and Mitcheltree v. Stair (135 App. Div. 210 [1st Dept.]), should not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kline v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Mitcheltree v. StairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Time Incorporated v. Bernard Geis AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Birnbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Frederick Chusid & Co. v. Marshall Leeman & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Meeropol v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.