Prettyman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. James S. Prettyman and others were convicted of violating an action of banking act, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
In October, 1898, the First National Bank of Dresden, Ohio, commenced business as a national bank with a capital of $50,000. James S. Prettyman, one of its directors, became its vice president, and Cephas S. Eittich was appointed its cashier. They were continued in office until the latter part of 1907. The president of the bank, Prettyman, its vice president, and Eittich, its cashier, were appointed an exchange or discount committee; but the committee appears never to have held a meeting after its organization. The Muskingum Valley Woolen Manufacturing Company, which…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. De AngeloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- United States v. John R. Adamson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Schmeller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Neff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Galbreath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.