Philyaw v. Arundel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The administrator of Durand Philyaw brought a suit subsequently removed to the federal court against Arundel Corporation charging that Philyaw was killed by reason of the failure of the defendant to furnish him with a safe place to work when acting as its employee in the operation of a steam shovel in the construction of a dam across the Saluda river in Lexington county, S. C. There was no complaint that the machinery was defective, but it was said that the deceased was an inexperienced employee and was not properly warned as to a certain danger attending the adjustment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Southern Pacific Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McMullen v. Ursuline Order of SistersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952