Legal Opinion

Dempster v. Rawnsley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1949No. Civ. 17056PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by James Rawnsley from a decree determining the persons to whom distribution of an estate shall be made.

Ann Seddon Rawnsley died testate. She left surviving, as her only heirs, James Rawnsley, her husband, and Ann Seddon Dempster and Ena Solly, daughters. In her will she bequeathed and devised her entire estate to James Rawnsley for life, remainder to Ena Solly. She omitted to provide in the will for her daughter, Ann Seddon Dempster, and it does not appear from the will that such omission was intentional. Ann Seddon Dempster petitioned the probate court to determine to whom…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cummings v. BramhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. In Re the Estate of HayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Estate of VanderhurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Guardianship of HudelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Elliott v. Western Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoefflin v. HolcombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Nielsen v. HannafordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Hirning v. WebbIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Estate of LackeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Montgomery v. BarcalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API