Legal Opinion

Gordon v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2016No. Case No. 20140345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice LEE,

opinion of - the Court:

[ 1 This case and its companion, Meinhard v. State, 2016 UT 12, 871 P.3d 87, present issues of first impression under Part 8 of the Post-Conviection Remedies Aét (PCRA). Uran Cope §§ 78B-9-300 to -804. In this case Adrian Gordon's petition for postconviction DNA testing was denied on the basis of the State's assertion that Gordon had declined to request DNA testing at the time of the underlying trial for "tactical reasons." Id. § T8B-9-801(4). We reverse and remand on procedural grounds. We hold that Gordon was entitled to file a memorandum…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. CrosbyUtah Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Meinhard v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. LabrumUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  5. General Water Technologies v. Van ZwedenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API