Legal Opinion

Meinhard v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2016No. Case No. 20140038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

{1 In this case and another heard at the same time, Gordon v. State, 2016 UT 11, 369 P.3d 1255, we consider important issues of first impression under Part 3 of the Postcon-viction Remedies Act (PCRA). Urax Cope § 78B-9-800 to -804. In this case we consider an appeal from the denial of a postcon-viction petition for DNA testing under seetion 301(2)(f) of that statute, The district court denied the petition under that provision on the basis of its determination that the petitioner had not established that the evi-denee in question had the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Hi-Country Property Rights Group v. EmmerUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Strohm v. Clearone Communications, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. VCS, Inc. v. La Salle Development, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. MacDonald v. MacDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Gordon v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Ross v. KrachtUtah Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API