Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1992No. 62021PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) for Plaintiff’s failure to give timely notice to GEICO of an accident caused by phantom driver. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed suit for injuries she allegedly sustained on January 25, 1990, while she was a paying passenger on a bus operated by Bi-State Development Agency on Grand Avenue in St. Louis. Plaintiff alleged her injuries were caused when she slipped and fell on the bus due to a sudden stop. She also alleged a “phantom vehicle” failed to keep a careful lookout, drove…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Billings v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Girard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Friend v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tresner v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. B&L Farms Partnership v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API