Legal Opinion
Tresner v. State Farm Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 19, 1995No. 78173PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM 1 .
After being injured in an automobile accident, Leland Tresner filed suit to recover damages based upon the uninsured motorist coverage in his automobile insurance policy issued by State Farm Insurance Company. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of State Farm because Tresner failed to comply with the notice provisions in the policy. Tresner now appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there are genuine issues of material fact concerning whether Tresner was physically incapable of providing notice after the accident, whether…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Greer v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. DierkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Interstate Cleaning Corp. v. Commercial Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Weaver v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Emerson Electric Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Hollis v. BlevinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.