Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Richards

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1959No. 8690PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

This was an action to enjoin maintenance of a tennis court and fence allegedly built in violation of a real property restrictive covenant and a Salt Lake City ordinance. From a judgment of dismissal, no cause of action, plaintiffs appeal.

The parties are contiguous owners of real property located within Northcrest Subdivision, an exclusive residential area located in the avenues of Salt Lake City. Defendants’ residence is located between those of plaintiffs, Parrish and Peterson. Prior to the acquisition by any of the parties of any of the tracts of lands here involved,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reese Howell Co. v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  2. O'Gara v. FindlayUtah Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. A.T.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Dansie v. Hi-Country Estates Homeowners AssociationUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Freeman v. GeeUtah Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API