Legal Opinion
Jiricko v. Moser & Marsalek, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 1, 1999No. 4:98CV1893 CDPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PERRY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint and its motion for protective order. Plaintiff has styled his response to the motion to dismiss as a motion to strike. For the reasons set. forth below, the Court finds the motion to dismiss to be well taken, and will grant it and deny the motion to strike. The Court will also deny defendant’s motion for protective order. However, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the Court will order plaintiff to show cause why he has not violated the rule and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Black Hills Sioux Nation Treaty Council v. Azarga Uranium CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Black Hills Sioux Nation Treaty Council v. Azarga Uranium CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Black v. Social Security Admin.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Gardner v. WiseDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Reints v. City of Rapid City, South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.