Legal Opinion
Black v. Social Security Admin.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 29, 2022No. 5:20-cv-05083Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION JACOB A. BLACK, CIV. 20-5083-JLV Plaintiff, ORDER vs. HECTOR URCELAY, in his official capacity, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jacob Black, appearing pro se, filed a complaint alleging a violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794. (Docket 1). Defendant Hector Urcelay1 timely filed an answer. (Docket 29). Mr. Black filed a motion for summary judgment together with one exhibit and an affidavit. (Dockets 69, 69-1 & 70). Mr. Urcelay filed a motion for summary judgment together with a legal memorandum, a statement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.