Legal Opinion

Nunez v. Caldarola

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 30, 1999No. 13-97-184-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice YÁÑEZ.

In this legal malpractice case, appellants Serafín and Paulina Núñez (“the Nu-ñezes”), 2 appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, Gayle Calda-rola. In four points of error, appellants contend the trial court erred in: (1) granting summary judgment on the basis of limitations; (2) taking judicial notice of documents in other causes; (3) granting appellee’s motion to transfer venue; and (4) granting monetary sanctions against appellants. We reverse the trial court’s order granting sanctions in favor of Calda-rola and as modified, affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Eiland v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Eiland v. Turpin, Smith, Dyer, Saxe & McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  4. Nunez v. Caldarola, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  5. Nuñez v. CaldarolaTexas Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API