Legal Opinion

Nuñez v. Caldarola

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 99-1075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

One of the issues in this legal-malpractice case is whether the rule we announced in Hughes v. Mahoney & Higgins, 821 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.1991), tolled the statute of limitations on the plaintiffs’ claims. The court of appeals held that it did not, and affirmed a summary judgment for the defendant on limitations grounds. 2 S.W.3d 755.

In light of our recent decisions in Apex Towing Co. v. Tolin, 41 S.W.3d 118 (Tex.2001), and Underkofler v. Vanasek, 2000 WL 33191375 (Tex.2001), without hearing oral argument, we grant the petition for review without reference to the merits, vacate the court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Underkofler v. VanasekTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Nunez v. Caldarola, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nunez, Serfin and Paulina Nunez v. Caldarola, Gayle, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API