Legal Opinion

Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Wilson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

EBOM SHELBY. Appeal in error from tbe Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is an appeal in error, prosecuted by the Memphis Street Railway Company from a judgment for $2,250.00, obtained against it by Ed Wilson, as damages for personal injuries received by him in a collision of one of the company’s electric cars with his horse and wagon and himself at the crossing of streets on which he and the car were traveling respectively.

The controlling facts of this record are to be found in an opinion delivered by Judge McAlister on a former appearance of the case in this Court, and reported in 105 Tenn., at pp. 74 to . 85, inclusive.

*620The fourth and fifth assignment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saunders v. City & Suburban RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Railroad v. PughTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Citizens' Rapid Transit Co. v. SeigristTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Railroad v. WyrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Barr v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. American Lead Pencil Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Patton v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API