Legal Opinion

Saunders v. City & Suburban Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1897PublishedCited by 36 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal in error ,from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Dr. D. D. Saunders brought this action against the City & Suburban Kailroad Co., to recover $20,000 as damages for personal injuries averred to have been inflicted upon him by its wrongful and negligent conduct in operating one of its cars at a high and dangerous rate of speed, and suddenly running upon him while endeavoring to cross its track at the intersection of two streets. The defendant pleaded not guilty and contributory negligence. Verdict and judgment were for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed in error from the action of the trial Judge in overruling his motion for a new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Railroad v. PughTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Citizens' Rapid Transit Co. v. SeigristTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Holmes v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Railway Co. v. HullTennessee Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. LeachTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. American Lead Pencil Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API