Legal Opinion

Railroad v. Wyrick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM GRAINGER. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Grainger County. W. R. Hicks, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The defendant in error, Arminda Wyriek, recovered a verdict and judgment in the Circuit Court of Grainger County against the railroad for the sum of $5,500 for the alleged negligent killing of her husband. A motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment was made on behalf of the company. The Circuit Judge was of opinion the damages assessed by the jury were excessive, and plaintiff’s counsel entered a remittitur of $2,500. The Court, thereupon, overruled the motion for a new trial, and pronounced judgment in favor of *502plaintiff below for $3,000. The company appealed, and has assigned errors.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. WillbanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Davidson Benedict Co. v. SeversonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Law v. Louisville N.R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Virginia & S. W. Ry. Co. v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API