Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Ross

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 9, 1946No. 39837PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, C. J.

In the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, appellants filed this action against respondents to compel them to convey to appellants a parcel of real estate pursuant to a written contract which was attached to and made a part of appellants’ petition. Respondents filed their motion challenging the sufficiency of appellants’ amended petition, and this was sustained by the trial court. Appellants declined to further plead and the court entered a judgment for respondents and dismissed appellants’ petition.

Appellants’ amended petition alleged that on August 14, 1944, appellants and respondents…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paisley v. LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Fullington v. Ozark Poultry Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Black & Snyder v. Crowther & AndrianoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Baldwin v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilt v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Cummins v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Three-O-Three Investments, Inc. v. MoffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Textured Fibres, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  5. Commercial Mortgage & Finance Corp. v. Greenwich Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API