Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Guire

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

It is the settled law of our state that before a judgment by default regularly entered will be opened for the purpose of interposing a defense, the one seeking to invoke the aid of the court must show surprise and merit. Schwenk v. DeMaio, 79 N. J. L. 189; 74 Atl. Rep. 267; Lavino & Co. v. National Surety Co., 104 N. J. L. 475; 141 Atl. Rep. 663; Hanover Trust Co. v. Rizzo, 110 N. J. L. 581, 582; 166 Atl. Rep. 326. Does defendant’s proof show surprise and merit? We recur to the facts.

*796On June 1st, 1933, plaintiff’s intestate, while riding as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanover Trust Co. v. RizzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. E. J. Lavino & Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. Schwenk v. DeMaioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. PerehinysNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Loranger v. AlbanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API