E. J. Lavino & Co. v. National Surety Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Katzenbach, J.
In the above case I allowed a rule to show cause why a judgment entered by default against the defendant should not be opened and the defendant be permitted to file an answer. Under this rule depositions have been taken. The suit was instituted by E. J. Lavino & Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff), against the Fational Surety Company (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), upon a bond given by the Fational Surety Company, as surety, to the county of Camden under chapter 75 of the laws of 1918. William M.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. KnoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Clark Plastering Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- McCarthy v. GuireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Paul H. Jaehnig, Inc. v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952