Legal Opinion

Lee v. Tysdal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1925No. 24,638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

In 1874 plaintiff entered into an oral partnership agreement with L. O. Tysdal and Osmund Tysdal. Two years later it was dissolved by mutual consent. Plaintiff claimed that no settlement was ever made as to the partnership assets. In April, 1918, L. O. Tysdal (reciting that he was authorized to act for Osmund Tysdal) and plaintiff signed a paper as a submission to arbitration to “settle the old partnership.” Each chose an arbitrator and these two selected a third. The three then, upon written statements from the parties, decided that the partnership had been ignored by the Tysdals, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holdridge v. StowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Dufresne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zelle v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. EEC Property Co. v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Lampert Bros. Lumber Co. v. Jake Lampert Yards, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API