State v. Mickens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant pled guilty to an information charging him with assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of Minn. St. 609.225, subd. 2. Upon his appeal from the judgment, he seeks a reversal of his conviction upon claims that he was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel and that the court improperly accepted his plea of guilty. He argues that his admissions and statements of the events giving rise to the charge during questioning disclosed that he was intoxicated at the time and thus, under § 609.075, 2 his intoxication was a potential…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State v. WaldronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. CorrivauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State v. HerdinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. OttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. FortmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Oney v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.