Legal Opinion
Marquip, Inc. v. Fosber America, Inc. And Fosber Spa, and United Container MacHinery Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 27, 2000No. 99-1025, 99-1120PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin ruled that defendants Fosber America, Inc., Fosber SpA, and United Container Machinery, Inc. did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,200,276 (the ’276 patent) under the doctrine of equivalents. See Marquip, Inc. v. Fosber America, Inc., No. 96-C-726-S (W.D.Wis. Sept14, 1998) (order). The district court also denied Marquip, Inc.’s motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). See Marquip, Inc. v. Fosber America, Inc., 30 F.Supp.2d 1142 (W.D.Wis. 1998) (order). Because the district court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Demarini Sports, Inc. v. Worth, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Fiskars, Inc. And Fiskars Oy Ab v. Hunt Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Optical Disc Corporation v. Del Mar Avionics and Bruce Del MarCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Fin Control Systems Pty, Ltd. v. Oam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.