Legal Opinion
Fiskars, Inc. And Fiskars Oy Ab v. Hunt Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 15, 2002No. 01-1193PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Fiskars OY AB and Fiskars, Inc. (collectively “Fiskars”) are the owner and exclusive licensee, respectively, of U.S. Patent No. 5,322,001, which is directed to a paper trimmer with a rotary blade. Fiskars filed suit against Hunt Manufacturing Co. (“Hunt”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, alleging that Hunt’s Heavy Duty 12" Paper Trimmer infringed the Fiskars patent. A jury found Hunt liable for infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and awarded Fiskars more than $3 million in lost profits damages. Twenty-one months…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Networks Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Aero Products International, Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- CNA Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.