Moore v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
This appeal of a conviction for robbery, 1 presents the issue of whether the arresting police officer inadequately advised appellant of his Miranda 2 rights, thereby rendering inadmissible during the government’s case-in-chief his inculpatory statement made in response to questioning by a second police officer shortly following his arrest. We conclude that the warnings were indeed inadequate and accordingly reverse appellant’s conviction.
Around lunchtime on April 5, 1979, Special Police Officer Harold Robinson heard screams coming from the stationery department at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hammill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Reiman v. International Hospitality GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989