Legal Opinion

Nexteel Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 21, 2019No. Consol. 17-00091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Choe-Groves, Judge:

Before the court are two motions for reconsideration filed by Consolidated Plaintiff SeAH Steel Corporation ("SeAH") and Defendant-Intervenors Maverick Tube Corporation, TMK IPSCO, Vallourec Star, L.P., Welded Tube USA, and United States Steel Corporation (collectively, "Defendant-Intervenors"). See Mot. Pl. SeAH Steel Corporation Reconsideration Ct.'s Jan. 2, 2019 Order, Jan. 28, 2019, ECF No. 149 ("SeAH's Mot."); Rule 59 Mot. Reconsideration Ct.'s Remand Order, Feb. 1, 2019, ECF No. 150 ("Def.-Intervenors' Mot."). Both motions request that the court reconsider certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  4. Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  5. Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  2. Carpenter Tech. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  3. Tianjin Magnesium Int'l Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API