Legal Opinion
Loop v. McCracken
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1929No. 21584. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appellants, owners of a tract of land within the port district of the port of Anacortes, instituted this action to restrain and enjoin the port commissioners of that port from issuing $93,000 worth of bonds, upon the grounds that the election held to authorize the issuance, in North LaConner precinct, a portion of the port district, was in all respects illegal.
The theory of appellants as to the irregularity of the election was based upon the alleged facts: That no legal notice of election was given in North LaConner precinct; that no election was held within that precinct; that no proper…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Rands v. Clarke CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Murphy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Ex Parte WhiteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Peard v. State ex rel. HueringNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilkinson v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Pemberton v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Fred Meise v. Michele Jaderlund, Grant County AuditorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. School Districts Nos. 45 & 13Washington Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.