Peard v. State ex rel. Huering
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Hamilton county. Tried below before Bates, J. cited, as to the validity of the votes: Cooley, Const. Linn, 599, 616, 618; People v. Maynard, 15 Mich., 463; Panning v. Carpenter, 20 N. Y., 447; Dobson v. Dobson, 7 Neb., 296; Parker v. Kuhn, 19 Id., 396; State v. Leavitt, 33 Id., 285; Ft. Dodge v. Dist. Twp., 17 la., 85; Barry v. Lauek, 5 Cold. [Tenn.], 588; Foster v. Scarff, 15 O. St., 532; People v. Salomon, 46 111., 415.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is a mandamus proceeding begun in the district court of Hamilton county by the relator, John W. Huering, against the respondents, Richard H. Peard, county clerk of said county, L. W. Shuman, his deputy, John O. Ferguson, Jr., Chas. P. Whiteside, and Oscar D. Shanklaud. The material facts, according to the stipulation of counsel, are as follows: '
Hamilton county is divided into three commissioner districts, numbered the first, second, and third districts. The *374third district-aforesaid includes within its boundaries a part of the city of Aurora, which is a city of the secoud class, having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Lanning v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. HolihanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- People ex rel. Hayes v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by14 opinions
- People ex rel. Agnew v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Brown v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State ex rel. Byrne v. WilcoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Kerlin v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Norton v. Van CampNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.