Legal Opinion
California Energy Commission v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1985No. 83-7962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners filed this original action seeking review by this court of certain aspects of the Bonneville Power Administration-(“BPA”) 1983 wholesale power rates, promulgated under authority of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (the “Act”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 839-839(h) (1982).
Petitioners are the California Energy Commission (“CEC”) and two of its individual members. CEC, a statutory agency responsible for adoption and implementation of California energy policy, forecasts energy needs and certifies construction of power plants in California.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wisconsin Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Energy Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Pacificorp v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Atlantic Richfield Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986