Legal Opinion

Brinson v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1932No. 21928PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Applications for new trials in the city court of Waynesboro are governed by the same laws and regulations as those in the superior courts of this State, except in specified particulars. “Whenever a case is heard at either a regular or special session of said court and defendant desires to move for a new trial, such motion must be made within two days after the adjournment of the session . . ; . . when such session shall be adjourned over for more than two days, then said motion shall be filed within two days from the date of adjournment.” Ga. L. 1903, p.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem. Truluck v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  2. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Benson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Peterson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  4. Dozier v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  5. Jordan v. BosworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Lavan v. PhilipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Price v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. H. R. Lee Investment Corp. v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API