Clarke v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERS, Justice.
Appellant, Matthew Thomas Clarke, was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (Vernon 1989). The jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
We affirm.
Appellant brings the following six points of error on appeal of his conviction alleging that the trial court erred in admitting: (1) DNA-PCR forensic evidence in violation of the standard established in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923); (2) evidence of DNA-DQ alpha typing, even as judged under the “relevance” standard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.