Legal Opinion
Evans Hotel, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 28, 2025No. 3:18-cv-02763Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EVANS HOTELS, LLC, et al. Case No.: 18-cv-2763-RSH-AHG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ 13 v. FEES 14 UNITE HERE! LOCAL 30, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On April 3, 2025, the Court determined that Defendants were “prevailing parties” 19 within the meaning of California’s anti-SLAPP statute, California Code of Civil Procedure 20 § 425.16, and that Defendants were therefore entitled to recover attorneys’ fees. ECF No. 21 183 at 12.1 Given that the fee motion was filed years ago—prior to Defendants’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.