Legal Opinion
United States v. Atkins
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 20, 1922No. 45, 46PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
". Under authority of acts of Congress the [Dawes] Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes enrolled Thomas Atkins. as a Creek Indian alive on April 1, 1899; the Secretary of the Interior approved; an allotment was selected for him; a patent issued and was recorded as required by law. Minnie Atkins undertook, as his sole heir, to convey the land to certain named defendants. Alleging that Thomas Atkins never existed and that his enrollment came about through fraud and gross mistake of law and fact, the United States brought this proceeding against many defendants to annul the allotment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Vance v. BurbankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. WildcatSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Fuhrmann v. FanrothNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Roberts v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Cherokee Freedmen & Cherokee Freedmen's Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.