Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Emery

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 6, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

On November 13,1933, at quarter past five o’clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff, who had made a social call, was walking homeward, in Sanford. She was proceeding northerly, on a sidewalk on the east side of School Street in that town. She walked to, and across, an intersecting street known as Mousam Street, and was continuing her way on the School Street sidewalk, when an automobile operated by one Claude O. Prime struck her; the resultant injuries were grievous.

Seeking damages, plaintiff brought this action, wherein Linwood J. Emery, the driver of a second automobile, is sole defendant.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Cleveland v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  3. Russell v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Maine Water Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  5. Neal v. RendallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roche v. EganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Gregware v. PoliquinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  3. Larson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  4. Greene v. WilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  5. Robinson v. Le SageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API