Legal Opinion

United States v. Winningham

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1996No. Crim. 4-96-134PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MONTGOMERY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court pursuant to both parties objections to the December 5, 1996 Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson. In the R & R, Judge Erickson recommended this Court deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss, but grant in part 1 Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. After conferring with the parties on December 20, 1996, the Court has decided to adopt Judge Erickson’s R & R.

BACKGROUND

The factual background for this matter is clearly and concisely set forth in the R & R. The Court incorporates those…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ralph Wayne AngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Joseph RodiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Rhonda Anne McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Patrick J. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API