Legal Opinion
Morton v. Hanes
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Hudson T. Morton against Laura A. Hanes for rent. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
This is an action of assumpsit upon a lease, executed March 16, 1907, containing, among other provisions, the following:
*367“Witnesseth, that the said party of the first part has agreed to let, and does hereby let to the said party of the second part, and the said party of the second part has agreed to take, and hereby does take, from the said party of the first part the following described premises situated in the city of Ann Arbor, county of Washtenaw and State of Michigan, to wit, the house and premises known as number 611 Church street in the city of Ann Arbor, State of Michigan, to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jaffe v. . HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rhoades v. SeidelMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Steefel v. . RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Tyler v. DisbrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bryan v. Houseman-Spitzley Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Sill v. O'RourkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1958