Legal Opinion

Rembert v. Lipshutz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s timely motion to strike the case from the Trial Calendar should have been granted since the record established that plaintiff filed a note of issue and statement of readiness before defendant had a reasonable opportunity to complete disclosure and notice of physical or mental examination of the infant plaintiff (see Sado v Sado, 32 AD2d 546; Siegel, New York Practice, § 370; see, also, 22 NYCRR 3.5, 1024.4). The court’s broad discretionary power under CPLR 3103 to grant a protective order to prevent abuse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wegman v. WegmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Rembert v. LipshutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Sado v. SadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman Music Shop, Inc. v. Honeywell Protection Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API