Rembert v. Lipshutz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s timely motion to strike the case from the Trial Calendar should have been granted since the record established that plaintiff filed a note of issue and statement of readiness before defendant had a reasonable opportunity to complete disclosure and notice of physical or mental examination of the infant plaintiff (see Sado v Sado, 32 AD2d 546; Siegel, New York Practice, § 370; see, also, 22 NYCRR 3.5, 1024.4). The court’s broad discretionary power under CPLR 3103 to grant a protective order to prevent abuse…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wegman v. WegmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rembert v. LipshutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Sado v. SadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoffman Music Shop, Inc. v. Honeywell Protection Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984