Legal Opinion

Rembert v. Lipshutz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of protection preventing him from examining the infant plaintiff (now six years old) before trial or obtaining disclosure of the name and address of her natural father. Examination before trial of plaintiff mother has been scheduled. The action seeks damages for personal and psychiatric injuries sustained by the infant as a result of defendant’s acts of sexual abuse. Defendant has pleaded guilty to a criminal charge of oral sodomy and by his answer to the complaint admits that act. The case is thus one for the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muscoreil v. Pool Mart, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Almy v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Rembert v. LipshutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API