Legal Opinion

Wegman v. Wegman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1975PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Since the defendant alleged in her counterclaim that she was suffering from certain specified ailments in addition to general poor health, her "physical condition” was "in controversy” within the meaning of CPLR 3121 and the plaintiff was entitled to request a physical examination. CPLR 3121 does not prohibit such examinations in matrimonial actions, and although we recognize the potential for abuse in these cases, the court’s broad discretionary power to grant a protective order "to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage, or other prejudice to any…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rosenblitt v. RosenblittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. VISCUSO, ANGELO M. v. VISCUSO, SUSAN M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Garvin v. GarvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. McKenzie v. McKenzieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Ravnikar v. Skyline Credit-Ride, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API