Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sprint Communications Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 2004No. 03-3087, 03-3140, 03-3659, 03-3660PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

In this case, we are asked to review a nationwide class certification, accompanied by an injunction against all competing class actions. The plaintiff class is made up of landowners whose property is subject to railroad rights of way, along which defendant telecommunications companies have installed fiber-optic cables without the landowners’ permission. See generally Jeffery M. Heftman, Railroad Right-of-Way Easements, Utility Apportionments, and Shifting Technological Realities, 2002 U. Ill. L.Rev. 1401. We reversed.certification of a virtually identical class…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. John H. Isaacs v. Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Buhl v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kent Eubank v. Pella CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. In re AT & T Mobility Wireless Data Services Sales LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  4. Smith v. Sprint Communications CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Cohen v. Blockbuster Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API