Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sprint Communications Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 2004No. 03-3087PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

387 F.3d 612

Wayne SMITH, Lesco Enterprises, Inc., San Simon Gin, Inc., Gross-Wilkinson Ranch Co., Rex Dolan, Everett Chambers, and Joanne Chambers, on their behalf and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., QWest Communications Corporation, Level 3 Communications, LLC, Wiltel Communications, LLC, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals of: Chem-Tronics, INC., Daniel R. Buhl, Joe C. Meighan, Jr., Charles W. Hord, and Joy Pratt Hord, Intervenors.

No. 03-3087.

No. 03-3140.

No. 03-3659.

No. 03-3660.

United States Court of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. John H. Isaacs v. Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Buhl v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re WorldCom, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Fager v. CenturyLink Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Gehrich v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Davidson v. Citizens Gas & Coke UtilityDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2006
  5. Kingsborough v. Sprint Communications Co., LpDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API