Legal Opinion

Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1953No. Appeal, 211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

This is a suit in equity for an accounting for royalties allegedly due under a license agreement covering a patent for heater boilers.

The agreement was entered into in 1945 between Hook and Ackerman, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, and Harold S. Ackerman and plaintiff’s decedent, C. Howard Hook. The agreement declared that the individuals, Hook and Ackerman, were the owners each of an undivided one-half part of a patent No. 2,247,796 for heater boilers, and they granted the corporation the exclusive right and license to manufacture, use and sell…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Kelly v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Fell v. PittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Young, Adm'r v. Bradford County T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. National Welding Equipment Co. v. Hammon Precision Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
  3. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Norristown Ford Co. v. Metropolitan Auto Dealer, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API