Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Haywood Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 2009No. COA08-420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Defendant Haywood Oil Company appeals from a judgment entered 4 June 2007 after a jury awarded defendant $57,500.00 “as just compensation for the appropriation of a portion of their property for highway purposes” and from an order entered 17 August 2007 which denied defendant’s motion for a new trial. For the reasons stated herein, we find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Facts

On 16 April 2001, plaintiff Department of Transportation (DOT) instituted an action for the partial condemnation of 2.98 acres of Haywood Oil’s real property for the widening of US…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Daniels v. HetrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Duke Power Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. HAYWOOD OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. In re J.N.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  3. In re J.N. & L.N.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API