In re the Detention of Broten
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Armstrong, J. —
Richard Broten appeals his commitment after a jury found that he was a sexually violent predator. Broten served a prison sentence for child rape and was then released on community custody. But he violated the community custody conditions1 and was again incarcerated. While he was in custody for the violations, the State filed a sexual predator petition, including an allegation that Broten had committed a recent overt act. But shortly before trial, the State amended the petition to omit the recent overt act allegation. Broten argues that the trial judge erred in allowing the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Detention of AlbrechtWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Detention of Henrickson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
3Cited by16 opinions
- Detention of Marshall v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Detention of LewisWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Detention of LewisWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Detention of BrotenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.