Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Lewis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2008No. 79364-6PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl

David James Lewis (a/k/a Roy Dale Eaker) challenges a published Court of Appeals, Division Three, decision which held that the State did not have the burden of pleading or proving a recent overt act during civil commitment proceedings against Lewis. He claims that due process requires the State to plead and prove a recent overt act since, at the time of filing the sexually violent predator (SVP) petition, Lewis was in custody pending retrial of a conviction different from the predicate conviction alleged in the petition.

Fairhurst, J.

¶2 We hold that Lewis was “about to be released from total…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re the Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re the Detention of DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. In Re Detention of FairWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. FelixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API