In re the Detention of Lewis
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
fl
David James Lewis (a/k/a Roy Dale Eaker) challenges a published Court of Appeals, Division Three, decision which held that the State did not have the burden of pleading or proving a recent overt act during civil commitment proceedings against Lewis. He claims that due process requires the State to plead and prove a recent overt act since, at the time of filing the sexually violent predator (SVP) petition, Lewis was in custody pending retrial of a conviction different from the predicate conviction alleged in the petition.
Fairhurst, J.
¶2 We hold that Lewis was “about to be released from total…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re the Detention of DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In Re Detention of FairWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. FelixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.