Legal Opinion

State v. McNutt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 22, 2004No. 49917-3-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Kennedy, J.

— Jack McNutt stipulated to commitment as a sexually violent predator, but reserved his right to appeal certain pretrial rulings. He contends that by denying his motion to dismiss the petition for the State’s failure to plead and prove a recent overt act, the trial court erroneously relieved the State of its burden to demonstrate current dangerousness and deprived him of due process. Because McNutt’s incarceration at the time of the petition for communicating with a minor for immoral purposes would, under the facts of the case, constitute a recent overt act if he had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re the Detention of AlbrechtWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Detention of Henrickson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Detention of Marshall v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. In Re Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re the Detention of MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API