Legal Opinion

Ebert v. Disher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Although the statement of facts are prolix, from the exceptions and assignments of error and the record, we gather that there is no dispute as to the “signing an order for a reference as appears of record.” The main controversy, as we understand it: When plaintiff complies with her agreement with defendant in relieving him of his obligation to the Security Life & Trust Company, and the deed is made to her, provision be made in the deed as set forth in defendant’s amended answer “subject to the defendant having an easement and right in and to said sewer line and cesspool and also subject to an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Luton v. Badham.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. McCall v. Textile Industrial InstituteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Kivett v. . McKeithanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Humphrey v. FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Wells v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Embler v. . EmblerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API