Janra Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that Article 39, Revised Ordinances of Honolulu (ROH) §§ 41-39.1 through -39.12, and, more specifically, the provision therein requiring that the area of a booth designated for viewing pornographic videos purchased on the premises of a pano-ram business 1 be visible from the booth’s entryway, (1) does not violate the right to privacy under article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i Constitution, as applied in State v. Kam, 69 Haw. 483, 748 P.2d 372 (1988), because a right to view adult material in an enclosed booth of a commercial establishment is not a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RomanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- In re Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. The Queen's Medical Center.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. The Queen's Medical Center.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RomanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.