Legal Opinion

Janra Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2005No. 25814PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that Article 39, Revised Ordinances of Honolulu (ROH) §§ 41-39.1 through -39.12, and, more specifically, the provision therein requiring that the area of a booth designated for viewing pornographic videos purchased on the premises of a pano-ram business 1 be visible from the booth’s entryway, (1) does not violate the right to privacy under article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i Constitution, as applied in State v. Kam, 69 Haw. 483, 748 P.2d 372 (1988), because a right to view adult material in an enclosed booth of a commercial establishment is not a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RomanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. The Queen's Medical Center.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. The Queen's Medical Center.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. RomanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API