Legal Opinion

State v. Romano

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2007No. 26110Published

1Opinion of the Court

155 P.3d 1102 (2007)

STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

Pame Ann Mary Leilani ROMANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 26110.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

February 27, 2007.

As Amended March 30, 2007.

William A. Harrison (Harrison & Matsuoka), on the briefs, Honolulu, for defendant-appellant.

Daniel H. Shimizu, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City & County of Honolulu, on the briefs, for plaintiff-appellee.

MOON, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, and DUFFY, JJ.; and LEVINSON, J., Dissenting.

Opinion of the Court by ACOBA, J.

We hold that Defendant-Appellant Pame Ann Mary Leilani Romano (Defendant) has not established, as…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API